You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'Writer's Workshop' category.
Go to sleep and set your alarm clock for 3am. Wake up at 3am and write whatever comes to you. It is the magical hour of slept over epiphanies, sandman soliloquies, the lucid writing in between dreaming and waking.
At 3am, I did not have to wake up. I was trying to sleep. I could not. This was no magical hour for me. It is 7:08 am now, Bangkok time. I slept restlessly earlier yesterday evening, but I could not fall asleep. Jet lag. And stress. I have that same pounding sensation in my chest. I got a massage today. I couldn’t relax. The pounding happened then too, and I thought I was going to die because I could not breathe.
It is sadness.
And I need healing.
There are always those types of people (I’m usually one of them) who looks around in developing or underdeveloped countries and thinks, wow, I’m lucky. I’m lucky I don’t have to be one of these poor people, the world is suffering so much blah blah blah I should be thankful. Look how happy they are, these poor kids.
I’m in Bangkok right now, and I look around. In the hotel lobby, 3am. 3 French guys flock in. Giggling Thai girls in hand. It looks exactly like what it is. I look at them. They’re taking pictures in compromising positions. I wonder what is going through all of their minds.
Probably sex. And money.
It’s not that difficult here, to get all the bodily pleasures that you want, and for cheap.
But then the harsh realization: there is no love here. Everything is meaningless.
The richest people here are the poorest. And they live no happy lives. They sit across from the biggest mall in Southeast Asia, limp babies in their arms, holding up empty cups for a spare baht. And yet in their desolation, they are rich.
I wonder that if survival from day to day was the only thing I had to worry about, if I would be all the happier. Perhaps not. But I would be so much richer.
Jessica- that’s my name. It means wealthy in Hebrew.
Perhaps this is a sign.
http://womenscreativecollective.org/blog/?page_id=8
I decided to try my hand at a writer’s workshop again. A women’s workshop this time. This should be interesting. I tend to dislike most women writers. Don’t kill me. There are some brilliant minds out there. After all, women are great communicators. But the problem is, women are just too complicated, and we can’t even understand each other sometimes…plus, half of us go insane at some point in our lives.
Today’s prompt is a little lame, I’ll admit. It’s about nuts. Poems about nuts. Desserty poem.
I dislike both nuts and poems. I’m not allergic to either, but I prefer to avoid both. So instead, I will write about going nuts. And perhaps being deserted.
Women in literature tend to be insane. Example: the lovemad woman in literature. I have no idea where that paper is from, nor do I quite agree. Classical male literature may lobotomize women’s psyche by belittling her insanity as merely a result of her hyper-emotions, but I do think it is possible to be lovemad, or just plain insane, even today, in a society that allows women to “speak for themselves” and not be “imprisoned in their homes, in their social roles…”. Madness is not confined to societies or time periods, and is not a result of repressed speech, or being abandoned by a lover. ”Lovemadness” is not limited to women either. Othello, hello. Men and women just tend to express it differently. Men tend to exert their frustration on others, and externalize their pain (working out, becoming violent, drinking). Women tend to internalize their pain, and end up prisoner to their own thoughts.
I think that herein lies the reason that I like male literature. Writers are forced to externalize their pain in a forced, constructed, and thus controlled way. Hemingway, O’Brien, are good examples. Their writing is often autobiographical. And they have a way of not just expressing their own pain, but a universal pain that others can somehow grasp. They deal with the pain of war, of death, etc.–things that merit insanity. When a man can express such emotions and pain so succinctly that a woman can understand–that is good literature.
Perhaps I just haven’t read a good amount of female literature. I like the Brontes’ work. I hate Asian-American women writers (yeah, yeah ironic because I am AAW). Sylvia Plath frightens me.
I think if anything, it is the uncontrolled realm that women writers often plunge you into. It leaves you vulnerable, hurting, and unresolved. And if there is a resolution, it feels oddly misplaced. The new house after living on Mango Street–it’s a little too quiet, a little too peaceful–and disconcerting. Perhaps I do not like female literature because it is something I already experience everyday. Sylvia Plath, I hate to admit, could have written a darker version of my autobiography. The madness, the pain, I understand it already.
I much prefer male madness–it’s simpler, perhaps. It’s more universal. It’s not as dark. It’s more palatable, more digestible. There are less jumbled emotions, and more productive actions. Men somehow seem to avoid the prison of the mind, though they often get entangled in feelings of inability, paralysis, and worst of all–emasculation. That’s when things get really bad.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not a strong advocate for all-testosterone fiction. There’s something to be found in balanced literature. I’m not a big fan of Vonnegut, if you want a good example of male literature about the insane, just as I’m not a big fan of Plath. They are too extreme. If anything, they frighten me when I realize that my thoughts run in the same direction, and to see these characters plunged into the darkness of their minds…not fun.
But there is something similar between madness in male and female literature–its fixation on the gender labels, or any other containing label: citizen, soldier, husband, wife, lover, ex-lover–though the labels themselves can be used in reference to identity, when they become a source of paralysis, madness ensues.
Literature needs a certain degree of vulnerability, candidness, openness, and yet control. Murakami, I feel, does an excellent job at this. He takes you on a controlled tour of the human soul and mind, and shows you all of its weaknesses, through the normally neutral, though emotionally sensitive narrator. And though there is some hopeful finality that he often taunts you with, and you know it could never happen, it still might, just maybe…
Maybe it happens after
The End.
